• Repeal Day Rant

    by  • December 5, 2010 • Drink, Travel • 4 Comments

    prohibition prescription

    copy of a prohibition-era prescription for alcohol

    Not long ago, in an era of our country’s history rife with stifling regulations, the Women’s Christian Temperance Union convinced the US congress to pass the Eighteenth Amendment outlawing alcohol production and sale in 1919.

    Prohibition did little to stop drinking or the “societal ills”. A good many righteous individuals drank their way through the time period with such clever techniques as labeling liquor as medicine, opening speakeasies, and brewing up bathtub gin.

    And so it was that Franklin Delano Roosevelt successfully campaigned for president in 1932 on a platform that included repealing prohibition. The Twenty First amendment was ratified on this day in 1933. Many economists believe that the increased tax revenue and employment from the repeal of prohibition contributed to drawing America out of the Great Depression.

    Cheers, right?

    Well, sorta. Though liquor is legally available, it remains a frustrating item to purchase. When we were in bourbon country last month, a part of the state that thrives on tourist money, we could find nary a shop open to sell Kentucky’s finest on Sunday. In fact there was nothing open on Sunday before noon, save church.

    Did you know that the Jack Daniels distillery is located in a dry county in Tennessee such that you can not even sample their whiskey on site? The acquisition of alcohol is so disparate across state lines that we have ‘check local liquor laws’ on our pre-travel to-do list.

    The making and selling of alcohol products are regulated beyond sanity. The proprietors of Kinkead Ridge, arguably the finest winery in Ohio, are so frustrated with Ohio inspectors and regulations that they have hinted they may move their winery out of state. Artisan distillers MiddleWest Spirits can never say with certainty where their OYO vodka is in stock (other than their own store) because they deliver cases to the state and the state distributes it, not necessarily following customer demand.

    God forbid you might want to make your own liquor, say if you have some hard cider you made from local apples that might make a tasty brandy. It’s flat out illegal to distill spirits for personal use according to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau. And we would never do anything illegal.

    In sum, I’m thankful for those who fought the good fight to restore legal alcohol consumption to Americans on this day 77 years ago. But I hesitate to celebrate when regulations still exist that hamstring businesses and constrain my ability to provide for myself that which generations have drunk before me.

    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

    About

    I am the keeper of the Hounds in the Kitchen. I live to eat and eat to live, planning every meal to include as much local and seasonal abundance as possible. I often wear purple and never refuse a drink.

    http://www.houndsinthekitchen.com

    4 Responses to Repeal Day Rant

    1. December 5, 2010 at 11:36 pm

      You said it, Rachel. I always feel so frustrated for all the breweries that have to deal with inconsistent laws from state to state. You can’t brew over this ABV, you can’t sell it at these times, etc etc. I’m all for protecting against what can be an addictive substance (some experience with that in my family), but such ridiculously frustrating laws, especially for companies that appreciate the art and craft of what they do, are counter-intuitive.

      • December 6, 2010 at 7:33 am

        For sure, alcohol can be damaging to individuals and families. Based on observations from addicts in my family, state and federal regulations do almost nothing to prevent alcoholism. Perhaps less regulation and a more honest upfront attitude about alcohol, such as is culturally normal in much of Europe, would be better at reducing rates of alcohol dependence.

    2. Bear
      December 5, 2010 at 11:59 pm

      Remarkable, too, how pervasive this quasi-Prohibition can be: Middle West has apparently had difficulty expanding into Kentucky because Ohio is all too aware of the potential it has for losing a lot of business to a non-liquor-control state across the border. Not just bad for consumers but bad for business too, apparently.

      • December 6, 2010 at 7:34 am

        This is really unfortunate to read.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    CommentLuv badge